<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Jarvis on Zeyad and Iraq</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thegeneralist.wordpress.com/2006/10/23/jarvis-on-zeyad-and-iraq/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thegeneralist.wordpress.com/2006/10/23/jarvis-on-zeyad-and-iraq/</link>
	<description>Just another CUNY GSJ weblog, by Matt Sollars</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 13:32:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Matt Sollars</title>
		<link>http://thegeneralist.wordpress.com/2006/10/23/jarvis-on-zeyad-and-iraq/#comment-28</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Sollars</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2006 14:22:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thegeneralist.wordpress.com/2006/10/23/jarvis-on-zeyad-and-iraq/#comment-28</guid>
		<description>We were all projecting. A year after 9/11, it was easy to justify any act that promised a return to stability and reason from chaos.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We were all projecting. A year after 9/11, it was easy to justify any act that promised a return to stability and reason from chaos.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Jarvis</title>
		<link>http://thegeneralist.wordpress.com/2006/10/23/jarvis-on-zeyad-and-iraq/#comment-27</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Jarvis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Oct 2006 20:30:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thegeneralist.wordpress.com/2006/10/23/jarvis-on-zeyad-and-iraq/#comment-27</guid>
		<description>Good post and a very interesting take. Jay Rosen responded to my post arguing that I&#039;d assumed the Bush Administration was reality-based. That&#039;s parallel to what you&#039;re saying: To use Californiapseak, I was projecting. And wrongly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good post and a very interesting take. Jay Rosen responded to my post arguing that I&#8217;d assumed the Bush Administration was reality-based. That&#8217;s parallel to what you&#8217;re saying: To use Californiapseak, I was projecting. And wrongly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
